6/13/2023 0 Comments Texmacs mathematica![]() Suppose that five years from now the company decides to put out a new version and break backwards-compatibility. Right now you like Mathematica and are happy with its software. There are enormous advantages to using open source standards. $\LaTeX$ is not only free like in beer, but free like in speech. It makes about as much sense as claiming that we should not use C or Python today because the language itself will become obsolete someday. ![]() Of all the things to pick as criticisms of Mathematica, I would not choose this issue to highlight. Support for older notebooks and methods to convert them have always existed and even if a notebook cannot be run, it can still be read. The irony is that Mathematica is not much younger than $\TeX$ itself-it has been around nearly as long, and the core syntax and language has essentially remained unchanged. Nothing is certain and all standards eventually evolve. In my opinion, the closed/open debate is irrelevant to the OP's question, and it doesn't sit well with me to fret over whether some kind of document format will be supported $n$ years down the line as some sort of justification for choosing one over another. Many journals these days even have their own templates they want you to use, so they can ensure a consistent look across articles. nb and consider it publication-ready, compared to a. So you could certainly use it to help you produce formulas to embed in your journal article, for example. ![]() But as I said, the two are complementary: Mathematica has a function called TeXForm that takes a StandardForm expression and converts it into $\TeX$ syntax. On the other hand, A Mathematica document can let the user evaluate formulas and manipulate interactive controls in ways that a static document can never allow. The emphasis of $\LaTeX$ is on controlling the exact placement of objects on a page, not the mathematical meaning of those objects. I am sure you could manage to replicate a lot of mathematical typesetting functions of $\LaTeX$ with Mathematica.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |